It’s been too long.
I’ve had a hankering to post for sometime, but time and attention are gnarly creatures.
But today feels like the day, and I return by revisiting a previously posted essay.
For today is our collective and now infamous ‘Never Forget’ day.
When I remembered this essay in today’s early hours, and then searched the site to find it, I couldn’t believe I wrote it only five years ago: 45’s first year in office.
Those 4 years — plus one of COVID —- seem like well over a decade.
I’m gobsmacked — only five years ago? That dissonance contains its own essay.
Not too much that I’d add to this piece, which I’m posting in its entirety.
With our abysmal failure in Afghanistan — who could have guessed — I believe the thoughts offered here are even more pressing.
Until next time. — JH
My mother called me that morning and said “Turn on the news, they are blowing up those towers! Those towers in New York! Turn it on now!” I then owned a television, a 13-inch in the living room.
Mom always woke early, but given the three-hour time difference between California and Cambridge, her call meant she’d not slept well, and she had too early turned on to the morning news.
It was a little before 9:00 in Cambridge. I was in the hallway when the phone rang.
I picked up the cordless sitting in a bookcase. With Mom on the phone, I walked to the living room and turned on CNN.
Within a few minutes, we saw the second plane go in.
Mom had talked about an impending terrorist attack for a few years, believed one was coming, and that morning she preached about what we saw together, 3,000 miles apart, and before any information was known.
Terrorism, no question. She invariably voted Democrat — and loathed Cheney in particular for being “a liar from hell” — but that morning she blamed what we watched on CNN as resulting from lax national security policies during the Clinton years. “The Democrats got lazy, they didn’t pay attention to national security. I knew this was going to happen, I knew it.”
(I later pointed out that the attack happened on Bush’s watch. She somewhat revised her opinion, given her hatred of Cheney & Co.)
Terrorism. She knew it with the first plane, and she unconsciously knew that more than one tower would be hit, her use of “towers” when she called me was clairvoyance not simply sloppy speech habits.
After we hung up, I stayed glued to the television the rest of the day, hypnotized by the unfolding that poured through 13 inches, a reality larger than any screen could hold.
Classes started that week. I was numb, a stupor exacerbated by hypnotizing news scrolls, and cable television’s drama pandering.
I showed up for the first day of one class as it ended, something I’d never done. I obsessed about my class schedules, book buying, supplies, and all the rest two months ahead of the first week. But in that week’s daze, I showed up for this one class as it ended. I apologized to the professor, offering her only my lame 9/11 excuse, “I’m sorry, this has never happened before. I guess I’m shell-shocked from everything.”
When I write “I was numb” to describe my stupor, this does not mean I mourned lost American innocence.
We’ve never been innocent. Ignorant, yes. Innocent, no.
In those days, I held an unpopular narrative: I believed that American imperialism dictated we had this coming. Wasn’t a professor somewhere fired for saying that?
Our collective hubris, greed, and violence meant that karma waited patiently for us to change, to do better by others and the world.
Even at Harvard, or perhaps especially at Harvard, calling out American hubris meant knowing your audience well. I rarely spoke so, because A-M-E-R-I-C-A. As socially awkward and defiant as I am, even I knew better than to speak this criticism to many, especially those in collective grief.
America, a deity unto itself, the Great God who bears consumerism’s gifts, the safe salvation of dogma, and all wrapped in the comforts of white, capitalist Christianity. We still burn heretics in this country, but not with fire. We oust them from universities, or diminish their right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness by ostracizing them. At the very least.
The great God of Christian American Exceptionalism must be serviced like a Golden Bull.
I never understood, nor do I understand now, the need to fetishize the tragedies of 9/11. I’ve never understood the need to trot out this day every year, wear our victimhood like a shiny ornament, and decorate it in crying eagles, waving flags, and Jesus memes.
I’ve noticed that many folks who rarely do politics as public service coupled to policy and governance always manage to show up to “Never Forget.”
This does not honor those who died, it validates the victim narrative of those who need their nationalism served rare with a hot side of Christian values, while stoking Islamophobia.
Victimhood, a privilege. A source of extremism, with The Book beside.
This victimhood has nothing to do with those who actually lost partners, parents, children, friends.
Many of these folks actually started projects to create interfaith dialogues on community healing and outreach, September 11 Families For Peaceful Tomorrows being one of the most inspiring. Their motto comes from Dr. King, who wrote, “Wars are poor chisels for carving out peaceful tomorrows.”
I remember. And it’s possible to recognize one’s privileges, and still be stupefied when horror and fragility bombard you through 13 inches of televised narrative. Our shared existential fragility shone clear to me that day and in the weeks following, perhaps because I owned no blanket embroidered with Exceptional Eagles or Easy Christian Morals.
I believe that life’s preciousness is not meant to breed fear or loathing. It’s a call to deeper living, and creates a drive to carve respect and understanding from ashes.
Fear or love.
Too many chose fear; many who lost more than they believed possible chose love.
I no longer believe we had 9/11 coming. But actions create ripples, and America resists looking at the many demons lurking in her closets. In last year’s powerful essay, “The Falling Man,” Tom Junod discusses the iconic photo by Richard Drew:
Junod offers us another unspeakable crime:
” . . . the pictures that came out of the death camps of Europe were treated as essential acts of witness, without particular regard to the sensitivities of those who appeared in them or the surviving families of the dead. . . . They were shown as the photograph of the little Vietnamese girl running naked after a napalm attack was shown. They were shown as the photograph of Father Mychal Judge, graphically and unmistakably dead, was shown, and accepted as a kind of testament. They were shown as everything is shown, for, like the lens of a camera, history is a force that does not discriminate. What distinguishes the pictures of the jumpers from the pictures that have come before is that we—we Americans—are being asked to discriminate on their behalf. What distinguishes them, historically, is that we, as patriotic Americans, have agreed not to look at them. Dozens, scores, maybe hundreds of people died by leaping from a burning building, and we have somehow taken it upon ourselves to deem their deaths unworthy of witness—because we have somehow deemed the act of witness, in this one regard, unworthy of us.” [bold added]
We refuse to look at what would most teach us.
The falling man could hold us in his surrender to fragility as a powerful spiritual testament.
But we refuse to look, and we refuse to see.
If the terrorists hated us, it’s not because of our freedoms, it’s because U.S policies in the Middle East dictated by Saudi oil inevitably spawned a hatred born of poverty and ignorance. It takes little leadership to join fear and ignorance into violence, as we should rightly know.
But we refuse to look, we refuse to see.
Many years ago, I had a class at Harvard Divinity with James Lawson. A Methodist minister, after receiving his Ph.D., he went to India, trained on Gandhi’s ashram, came back to the states, and then accidentally met Dr. King in a coffee shop (a too easy summary). They talked, and King told Lawson he needed him in the movement.
Lawson ended up leading King’s civil rights nonviolent resistance training.
(It was a privilege to study with Dr. Lawson, and visit him during office hours.)
Lawson once said to us during a lecture, “America is addicted to violence. And it will never get over that addiction until it confesses and repents its original sins of genocide and slavery.”
Perhaps that’s what we’re witnessing now with the horrifying drunk uncle sitting at America’s helm, this grotesque caricature of our worst selves televised and tweeting in our faces 24/7. At some point the addict must admit her addiction, must look in the mirror. Perhaps we’re dealing on deep levels with our privileged stupor, facing our collective functioning alcoholic in the drunk-uncle-in-chief’s face.
But will we look? Will we finally see that we have arrived at our United States of The Lost Weekend?
I don’t know if we’re at a defining crossroads. I doubt it. Change isn’t that easy, rarely comes in tidy packages. But the unmitigated violence of Screeching Eagles and white Christian racist misogyny cannot hold.
Will we look, will we see? Like “Families For Peaceful Tomorrows,” will we remember better?